<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Priotize Twitter education before chats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memberclicks.com/blog/2009/10/13/priotize-twitter-education-before-chats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memberclicks.com/blog/2009/10/13/priotize-twitter-education-before-chats/</link>
	<description>Refresh Your Membership Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:00:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.memberclicks.com/blog/2009/10/13/priotize-twitter-education-before-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memberclicks.com/blog/?p=363#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Shannon,

Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts.  I certainly saw things very differently, but rather than reply here point by point, I felt it would be better to write a post: http://bit.ly/45Nk8P

Neither of us is right or wrong since they are just opinions.  However, there is one small item from your post that is not quite right: the number of people in a chat has no bearing on the speed.  In fact with more people in a chat, you are likely to get more tweets per minute due to the additional ideas.

The only thing that slows down Twitter Chats is Twitter itself.  Sometimes it lags due to the overall load on their servers from all the tweets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts.  I certainly saw things very differently, but rather than reply here point by point, I felt it would be better to write a post: <a href="http://bit.ly/45Nk8P" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/45Nk8P</a></p>
<p>Neither of us is right or wrong since they are just opinions.  However, there is one small item from your post that is not quite right: the number of people in a chat has no bearing on the speed.  In fact with more people in a chat, you are likely to get more tweets per minute due to the additional ideas.</p>
<p>The only thing that slows down Twitter Chats is Twitter itself.  Sometimes it lags due to the overall load on their servers from all the tweets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chats for Associations &#171; Future Business</title>
		<link>http://www.memberclicks.com/blog/2009/10/13/priotize-twitter-education-before-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Chats for Associations &#171; Future Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memberclicks.com/blog/?p=363#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...] is a very different set of opinions based on the same chat session over on Memberclicks.  I hope you will chime in with some of your thoughts either here or there. Possibly related [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a very different set of opinions based on the same chat session over on Memberclicks.  I hope you will chime in with some of your thoughts either here or there. Possibly related [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
